My Dominant Hemisphere

The Official Weblog of 'The Basilic Insula'

Elegance In Inelegance

with 2 comments

Courtesy Lydia Elle @ Flickr (by-nc license)

Courtesy Lydia Elle @ Flickr (by-nc license)

I just finished a great lecture series on the history of mathematics by Dr. David Bressoud recently1. Remember how I once spoke about elegance in inelegance? How some people have argued (eg: Lee Smolin) that the universe just might be complex by nature? How mankind might just be wrong about looking for simple and thus elegant solutions to explain physical phenomena?

Well, I was pretty intrigued by some of the stuff I learned about Henri Poincare‘s work in this regard. Poincare is famous for a number of things, his Poincare conjecture being the most obvious of them. A Russian math guru, Grigori Perelman, apparently proved this conjecture some years back and among other peculiar things, not only declined the Fields medal but also a million dollar prize for solving one of the toughest math problems ever known.

But I was particularly piqued by how Poincare was fascinated by this idea of finding elegance and hidden patterns even where one might expect junk. Here are what might be interesting questions as crude examples:

Take a random set of 100 beads. Throw these beads on the floor. They scatter randomly. How many throws would be needed to find at least three beads on the floor that yield an equilateral triangle when they are connected? How many throws would you need to find a cluster of beads that is of a certain shape or size?

That there is some sense of order even in randomness and chaos, is truly an enchanting concept.

Have any thoughts of your own? Do send in your feedback :-)!

1. Queen Of The Sciences (Lectures by David Bressoud)

Copyright © Firas MR. All rights reserved.

About these ads

Written by Firas MR

August 31, 2009 at 11:49 pm

2 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. [...] is truly random as opposed to pseudo-random? If we conclude that something is truly random, how can we ever be sure of it? What can we learn from how randomness is interpreted in inflationary cosmology in the manner that [...]

  2. [...] to ask ourselves if a random process could be pseudo-random as opposed to truly random – which can sometimes be a difficult thing to establish. So unlike our forefathers, we don’t immediately jump to conclusions about what look to our [...]


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

%d bloggers like this: